Multidistrict Litigation (MDL)

What is multi-district litigation?

When civil actions involving one or more common questions of fact are pending in different districts, such actions may be transferred to any district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings via a Motion to Transfer. (See 28 U.S.C. 1407) The Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation (JPML) makes the determination on approving the coordination of the cases as an MDL and which district the MDL will be transferred to.

When cases are transferred to the Northern District, the court will create the following case information: (1) individual member cases, which will include all the original transfer case dockets (2) a master MDL number and case title as designated by the JPML. This master MDL docket will be updated to include all party and counsel information, along with orders of the judge, party filings, and hearing and deadline information throughout the life of the MDL.

The presiding judge of the assigned MDL may permit direct filing of cases to our district. This means complaints would be submitted to our court as outlined by the presiding judge and required fees paid. The coordination of these would not be sent by JPML. Check the Judge’s Pretrial Order for clarification on this process. Our District will send communication to the JPML to notify they when direct filed cases are opened in our district.

Active MDLs in the Northern District

The list below includes all active MDLs in the District. MDLs are managed by the office where the assigned Judge sits.  Please refer to PACER for case information. Cases not listed have either been closed or stayed. Please contact the MDL clerk if there has been a clerical error and an active case needs to be listed.

MDL #
CAND Case #
Title
19174:07-cv-05944-JSTIN RE: Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation
27413:16-md-02741-VCIN RE: Roundup Products Liability Litigation
28433:18-md-02843-VCIN RE: Facebook, Inc., Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation
29133:19-md-02913-WHOIN RE: Juul Labs, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
29183:19-md-02918-MMCIN RE: Hard Disk Drive Suspension Assemblies Antitrust Litigation
29514:20-md-02951-HSGIN RE: StubHub Refund Litigation
29663:20-md-02966-RSIN RE: Xyrem (Sodium Oxybate) Antitrust Litigation
29813:21-md-02981-JDIN RE: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
29963:21-md-02996-CRBIN RE: McKinsey & Company, Inc., National Prescription Opiate Consultant Litigation
30474:22-md-03047-YGRIN RE: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation
30843:23-md-03084-CRBIN RE: Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
30875:23-md-03087-BLFIN RE: Future Motion, Inc. Products Liability Litigation
30983:24-md-03098-EMCIN RE: 23andMe, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
31013:24-md-03101-JSCIN RE: Baby Food Products Liability Litigation

Misconceptions about MDLs

“Among some common misconceptions about MDLs are that most are “mega-cases” and that they linger in the transferee courts for many years. To be sure, some MDLs meet the “mega-case” definition. And others, for various reasons, do remain in the transferee courts for lengthy periods of times. However, most MDLs do not fit either of these descriptions. Only thirty-seven out of about 300 active MDLs comprise more than 100 constituent actions and only ten have more than 1000. By contrast, about one-half of all open MDLs are comprised of ten or fewer actions. And, while it is true that a handful of open MDLs are quite old, there are not many, the number of their actions and claims is dwindling, and there are valid reasons for their continued existence.”

A View from the Panel: Part of the Solution John G. Heyburn II

Contact information and resource links

San Francisco415-522-2006
Oakland510-637-3530
San Jose408-535-5363

Local rules:  CAND     JPML
JPML Website: Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation