COURT OPERATIONS AND COURTHOUSE SAFETY PROTOCOLS
Per CDC guidelines, effective Monday, December 19, masking is not required in any divisional offices. Before coming to the courthouse, please review this notice.
PRESS AND PUBLIC ACCESS; INFORMATION ON OBSERVING COURT PROCEEDINGS HELD BY VIDEOCONFERENCE
See notice, list of upcoming hearings held by video, and Zoom guidance for attorneys and other hearing participants.
Consenting to a Magistrate Judge
The Court is currently experiencing a judicial emergency.
Your case may be resolved more quickly if you consent to a magistrate judge.
Cases of Interest
In re: HIV Antitrust Litigation
USA v. Nelson et al. ( Foakes, Ranieri & Burke)
In re Tesla Inc. Securities Litigation
This securities class action case is brought by a group of Tesla shareholders who allege that Elon Musk and Tesla violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5(b), by making materially false or misleading statements regarding a potential going-private transaction for Tesla that artificially affected the price of Tesla’s stock and other securities in August of 2018. Plaintiff also asserts that the members of Tesla’s Board of Directors violated Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which imposes liability upon persons responsible for controlling an entity that is found to have violated the federal securities laws.
Cornet et al v. Twitter, Inc. 3:22-cv-06857
Plaintiffs filed a putative class action complaint against Twitter claiming violations of the WARN Act (29 U.S. Code section 2101) and violations of California’s equivalent state law (Cal. Lab. Code section 1400).
United States vs. David Wayne Depape
A complaint was filed in this court charging David Wayne Depape with violations of 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(A) and (B), assault on the immediate family member of a federal official, and of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(d), attempted kidnapping of a federal official.
In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 3047)
This is a Multi-District Litigation (MDL) involving various defendants such as Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram LLC, Snap, Inc., TikTok, Inc., ByteDance, Inc., YouTube LLC, Google LLC, and Alphabet Inc. Plaintiffs have alleged that the defendants’ social media platforms are defective because they are designed to maximize screen time, which can encourage addictive behavior in adolescents. As alleged, this conduct results in various emotional and physical harms, including death.
Mickelson v. PGA Tour, Inc.
Professional golfers allege that the PGA acted an unlawful monopoly in suspending them for playing for LIV, Inc. They seek injunctive relief through a temporary restraining order that would permit them to compete in the FedEx Cup Playoffs.
USA v. Balwani
Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, former executive of health technology corporation Theranos, was charged along with Elizabeth Holmes with wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. The charges stem from Defendants’ allegedly deceptive representations about their company and its medical testing technology. Defendants are to be tried separately; Ms. Holmes’ trial concluded in January 2022.
USA v. Holmes, et al.
Elizabeth A. Holmes and Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, former executives of health technology corporation Theranos, are charged with wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. The charges stem from Defendants’ allegedly deceptive representations about their company and its medical testing technology.
In re: McKinsey & Company, Inc., National Prescription Opiate Consultant Litigation (MDL No. 2996)
MDL case involving the role of McKinsey & Co., Inc., in providing advice to opioid manufacturers in the sale of prescription opioid drugs. Plaintiffs are cities, counties, tribal governments, and other entities alleging various claims including public nuisance, negligence, fraud, unjust enrichment, violation of consumer protection statutes, and federal RICO claims.
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
Plaintiff Epic Games, Inc. brings this action against defendant Apple Inc., alleging violations of antitrust laws through its Apple App Store policies on iOS devices. Apple counterclaims that Epic Games has breached its developer agreements and App Store guidelines by introducing a direct pay option on iOS devices in Epic Games’ videogame Fortnite.
Plata/Coleman v. Newsom
Class action by state prisoners alleging inadequate health care and overcrowding
USA v. Funez Osorto, 19-cr-00381-CRB-4
(Compassionate Release Waiver)
Court rejects a plea agreement containing a modified waiver of compassionate release, holding that the waiver is contrary to Congressional intent.
In re: PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
In re: Juul Labs, Inc. Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation
Multidistrict litigation grouping cases alleging, in part, that JLI has marketed its JUUL nicotine delivery products to minors, that JLI’s marketing misrepresents or omits that JUUL products are more potent and addictive than cigarettes, and that JLI promotes nicotine addiction.
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al. v. William P. Barr, et al.
Plaintiffs seek to enjoin enforcement of interim final rule providing that noncitizens who transit through another country prior to reaching the southern border of the United States are ineligible for asylum here